Well, it’s official–Jacey Dae is signed up for speech.
Kellen went to work late today (after missing work for jury duty yesterday!) so he could come to the ARD meeting with us. ARD stands for Admission, Review, and Dismissal–this being our first meeting, it was our admission meeting. We’ll have review meetings at least once a year to evaluate her progress and then a dismissal meeting when she’s all done with the special education program. For this first meeting, we met at our elementary school with an assistant principal and Holly, the speech pathologist who evaluated Jacey a couple of weeks ago. Of course, the meeting was at 8 am, so we had to rush to get up and ready and there, meaning Rylan hadn’t eaten and Jacey was sleepy and whiney, but that’s beside the point.
First of all, Holly went over the results from Jacey’s tests. In the written report, there is a list of all the errors Jacey made on the CAAP (Clinical Assessment of Articulation and Phonology), which is what tested her articulation and phonology, whatever that is. I was shocked to see how many errors there were! I mean, I knew she had problems with speech, but seeing it all listed out like that was surprising.
After that, there is the analysis of the test results. Here’s where it gets kind of technical, so if you’re not interested, the important thing to know is: Jacey has some speech patterns that need to be corrected.
For those of you who know about speech, here are the details: Each pattern was listed with the percentage of time it occurred. It’s only considered clinically significant if the pattern occurred more than 40% of the time.
Final Consonant Deletion- leaving off the ending consonant or consonants of a word, like knife > ni–30% (meaning this was probably clinically significant very recently, and she’s just now learning to put sounds on the ends of her words)
Cluster Reduction- simplifying when there are multiple consonants together, like school > dool–100% (wow!)
Gliding- r or l pronounced as w or y–14% (totally insignificant; this is normal up until 5 years)
Vocalization- replacing l or r by a more neutral vowel, like jar > ju–13% (also totally normal)
Fronting (velar & palatal)- replacing sounds that should be made in the back of the mouth with those made at the front of the mouth, like gate > date–80% (this is typical up to 3 years 6 months, but she does it an awful lot)
Stopping- substituting an quick consonant for a harder, longer consonant, like seal > teal or cheese > tee–70%
Prevocalic Voicing- voicing what should be a voiceless consonant, like fish > dis or sheep > deep–25%
Postvocalic Devoicing- devoicing the final voiced consonant (not a very helpful description), like hive > dif–50%
On the forms we had to fill out before she was evaluated, we had to estimate how much of her speech was understood by family and by strangers. We guessed 90% was understood by us; 50% by strangers. But after reading part of the conclusion in the evaluation, I’m not sure that’s true. Holly wrote, “The evaluator noticed that Jacey’s spontaneous speech was very difficult to understand especially when the context was unknown. Many times Jacey’s mother naturally interpreted what Jacey was saying as she played and conversed with the examiner. Although Jacey demonstrates ‘age-appropriate’ phonological processes” (meaning most of the patterns mentioned above are still appropriate up to 3 1/2 or 4 years), “the high percentage on multiple processes” especially, she told us, cluster reduction, fronting, and stopping, “makes her speech unintelligible.”
That’s another jarring moment, much like seeing what PPCD stands for. That’s stated very baldly, “her speech [is] unintelligible.” Thank goodness we’re going to be able to get this fixed!
The rest of the report talks about the results of her language test (above average for sure, but no firm results since she couldn’t reach a ceiling on the test) and that she’s normal physically and socially.
After we went over that report, we finally got to the real ARD meeting. We had to sign a bunch of papers agreeing to enroll her and saying that she qualified for help and I don’t even remember what all. Then, we got to the page out of all the paperwork that we were really interested in: Jacey’s objectives. For now, her goals are, given a visual and verbal cue, to eliminate the use of stopping with 80% accuracy at first the word, then phrase, then sentence level, and to eliminate cluster reduction by producing two consonants in clusters at the word level with 80% accuracy. Once she starts speech, her teacher might modify these goals based on how she takes to the class.
For cluster reduction, I mentioned that we are sometimes able to get her to say “sssss nat” for “snack” as opposed to just “nat,” and Holly said that yes, that’s the problem–they have to teach her how to combine those consonants, not make two separate sounds or leave it off entirely.
A few more papers, and we were done. I told them when preschool and Ladies’ Bible Class is so that hopefully we can work her speech class around those things (please please please). I asked if we should get her hearing tested, and Holly said she’s not showing the problems you’d usually see in someone with hearing problems, but that it’s never a bad idea to test hearing when someone needs speech therapy.
So now we just wait for her speech teacher, Ms. Devine, to call us to schedule her class. She should call in the first week or two of school, depending on when she gets her schedule set for the school kids. Jacey’s been going through some separation anxiety lately, getting clingy and a little whiney if we have to leave her at Bible class or anywhere other than with Mimi and Gramps, so I’m concerned about dropping her off for the first time with a new teacher. I know she’ll be fine, and I know she’ll enjoy the class, and I know it’ll help her… but I’m not looking forward to tearing her away from me until she realizes she likes Ms. Devine and that speech is fun.
Whew. There you go. Our first ARD meeting down, now we just wait to start class! Yay!
